Recursive Evaluation Loops: How Frameworks Self-Correct in Layers

A strong framework doesn’t just output—it tests itself.

Every advanced system must evaluate its own logic—but TFIF frameworks go further.
They use recursive evaluation loops: self-similar, symbolic logic cycles that validate, score, and restructure their operations across depths.

The system doesn’t run and then evaluate—it evaluates as it runs.

---

🔹 TFIF Evaluation Loop Architecture

Recursive evaluation in TFIF uses three primary checkpoints:

• Depth 3 – Functional Pattern Check
• Depth 6 – Structural Alignment Check
• Depth 9 – Symbolic-Harmonic Integrity

Each loop iteration returns a value: F=∑(wn×rn),wherewn=3n−1F = ∑(wₙ × rₙ), where wₙ = 3ⁿ⁻¹ F=∑(wn​×rn​),wherewn​=3n−1

To pass evaluation, frameworks must score:

• F ≥ 9 (Fractal Function Pass)
• E > 0.9 (Energy Efficiency Threshold)

---

⚙ Real-World Application

✅ In AI Logic Trees:
TFIF-enabled agents reroute or collapse sub-patterns if output deviates at recursive depth.

✅ In Business Systems:
Marketing frameworks score themselves in real time based on symbolic resonance with audience response.

✅ In UX Design:
Interface flow logic is recursively scored for intent vs output drift, allowing live interface restructuring.

---

🧠 Why Static Evaluation Fails

Static frameworks use:

• Linear QA testing
• Manual error mapping
• Hard-coded logic endpoints

These collapse under:

• Input drift
• Symbol ambiguity
• Cross-domain application

Recursive loops adapt by restructuring logic from within, not externally patching it.

---

🧠 TFIF Summary:

• Recursive evaluation = self-correcting logic engine
• Fractal evaluation loops enable system longevity
• Each framework loop is its own feedback-checking layer
• Dynamic integrity maintenance without external validation